Effect of different food recall strategies on consumers’ reaction to different recall norms: A comparative study

Haiju Hu (First Author), Xiande Zhao (Participant Author), Liwei Xiao (Participant Author), Barbara Flynn (Participant Author), Ramdane Djebarni (Participant Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal

7 Citations (Web of Science)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose Using the combined theoretical umbrella of organizational legitimacy theory, service-dominant logic, fairness heuristic theory and two-factor theory, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of different food recall strategies (recall proactiveness and compensation) in terms of both how consumers react (perceived organizational legitimacy and purchase intention) and how recall norms would influence the effectiveness in three countries. In addition to the reporting of important results, this paper provides implications for food companies to handle effectively the recalls, especially when the recalls are cross-country. Design/methodology/approach A 2 compensation (high vs low) ×2 recall strategy (proactive vs passive) scenario experiment was conducted in Hong Kong, the USA and Mainland China. After checking the effectiveness of manipulation, the paper tested the main effect and interaction effect of recall proactiveness and compensation on perceived organizational legitimacy and purchase intention. In addition, the mediating effect of perceived organizational legitimacy between recall strategies and purchase intention was also tested. Findings Significant main effect, interaction and mediation effect were found across the three countries with a different pattern. For the USA and Mainland China which have strong recall norms, the interaction found followed the predictions of the two-factory theory. However, the pattern found in Hong Kong, which has weak recall norms, followed the predictions of the fairness heuristic theory. Full mediation effect of perceived organizational legitimacy between compensation and purchase intention was found in the USA and Mainland China, while it was only partial in Hong Kong. For the mediation between proactiveness and purchase intention, full mediation was found in Hong Kong and the USA, while it was only partial in Mainland China. Originality/value First, this study differentiated food recall strategy into two dimensions – recall proactiveness and compensation. Second, this study tested the applicability of two-factor theory and fairness heuristic theory in recalls by testing the competing hypotheses proposed according to the two theories. Finally, this study can further help our understanding of the recall effectiveness across different recall norms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2045-2063
JournalIndustrial Management & Data Systems
Volume117
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Corresponding author email

rami.djebarni@southwales.ac.uk

Keywords

  • Fairness heuristic theory
  • Organizational legitimacy
  • Product recalls
  • Recall norms
  • Recall strategy
  • Two-factor theory

Indexed by

  • SCIE
  • Scopus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of different food recall strategies on consumers’ reaction to different recall norms: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this