Abstract
Business associations in authoritarian regimes behave systematically different from their counterparts in democratic regimes. Using a unique dataset of Chinese private firms, this paper examines the impacts of joining the most prominent business association in China, the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce (ACFIC) which was initiated and strongly controlled by the government We find that ACFIC members have much higher chances to obtain formal political identities, that is, the deputy of People's Congress (PC) or the People's Political Consultative Conference (PPCC). However, ACFIC membership itself cannot help entrepreneurs acquire scarce resources that are controlled by the government. Rather, ACFIC members bear heavier tax burdens and make more informal payments to government officials. These findings suggest that the ACFIC act as a springboard into politics, rather than an effective collective action committee that can bring common benefits to its members or protect members from government predation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 166-183 |
Journal | China Economic Review |
Volume | 36 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Corresponding author email
wu.yiping@shufe.edu.cnKeywords
- Business associations
- CONNECTIONS
- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
- CORRUPTION
- ECONOMIC-GROWTH
- ENTERPRISES
- FINANCE
- FIRMS
- PARTICIPATION
- PERFORMANCE
- PRIVATE
- Political connections
- Private firms
Indexed by
- ABDC-A
- Scopus
- SSCI