Abstract
In this paper, we study airport decisions on pricing and capacity investment with both aeronautical and concession operations. In addition, the airport under consideration is serving air carriers who have market power. We find that a profit-maximizing airport would over-invest in capacity in the sense that the marginal (social) benefit of capacity is smaller than the marginal (social) cost. This tendency of overinvestment still holds when the private airport is under the regulatory constraint of cost recovery in its aeronautical operation (the dual-till regulation). We also find that the capacity investment by a public airport will be socially efficient in the sense that the marginal benefit of capacity is equal to the marginal cost of capacity. However, somewhat surprisingly, the capacity investment of the public airport will be inefficient if it is under regulatory constraints. Specifically, the airport will also over-invest in capacity, whether it is under a single-till regulation or a dual-till regulation. Finally, it is noteworthy that the inefficiency in airport investment is driven by the interaction between the airport and the carriers who have market power.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 404-413 |
Journal | Transportation Research Part B: Methodological |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Corresponding author email
zyimin@ceibs.eduProject name
Social Science and Humanities Research Council of CanadaProject sponsor
其他Project No.
N/AKeywords
- AIRLINE INDUSTRY
- Airport charges
- BEHAVIOR
- CARRIERS
- Capacity investment financing
- Commercial revenue
- DELAYS
- EXPANSION
- INTERNALIZATION
- MARKET POWER
- Market power
- OLIGOPOLY
- Regulation
Indexed by
- ABDC-A*
- SCIE
- Scopus
- SCI
- SSCI