Abstract
We examine the valuation impact of bank-financed M&As and the loan contracts
used to finance M&A transactions, focusing on the difference between bank-dependent
acquirers and other acquirers. We find that bank-financed deals have higher acquirer’s
CARs relative to other cash M&A deals, but this certification effect exists only for
bank-dependent acquirers. Despite bank-dependent acquirers being more susceptible
to hold-up, banks do not impose higher loan pricing or more stringent non-price terms
on them. After completion of the acquisition, bank-dependent acquirers retain the
M&A financing banks for a much larger share of their borrowing needs, suggesting the
importance of repeat business for lack of hold-up. Our findings highlight the positive
aspects of bank dependence and the importance of implicit contracting for the lack of
hold-up in lending markets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
Source
China Europe International Business School (CEIBS)Keywords
- Bank Dependence
- Bank Financing
- Creditor Monitoring
- M&A