TY - JOUR
T1 - Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance
AU - Wang, An-Chih Andrew
AU - Chou, Li-Fang
AU - Yammarino, Francis J.
AU - Huang, Min-Ping
AU - Ling, Hsiao-Chi
AU - Dionne, Shelley D.
AU - Spain, Seth M.
AU - Cheng, Bor-Shiuan
AU - Tsai, Chou-Yu
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.
AB - We propose a new typology of paternalistic leadership styles based on how leaders demonstrate authoritarianism and benevolence, the two essential components of this type of leadership. Benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership refers to leaders sole dependence on the use of benevolence without their strong assertion of authority, whereas authoritarianism-dominant paternalistic leadership is based mainly on authoritarianism itself; classical paternalistic leadership, which best fits early observations of paternalistic leaders, refers to the salient combination of both leadership components. We used two distinct samples and methods to test this typology and the association with subordinate performance. Across the two studies, a field investigation with Taiwanese military supervisor-subordinate dyads and a hypothetical scenario experiment with U.S. working adults, we found a positive relationship between classical paternalistic leadership and subordinate performance as strong as that between benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership and performance. Our findings echo the phenomenon that paternalistic leaders tend to combine benevolence with authoritarianism to affect subordinate performance.
KW - Authoritarianism
KW - Benevolence
KW - Paternalistic leadership
KW - Performance
KW - Polynomial regression
KW - Authoritarianism
KW - Benevolence
KW - Paternalistic leadership
KW - Performance
KW - Polynomial regression
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=ceibs_wosapi&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000453340900006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002
M3 - Journal
SN - 1048-9843
VL - 29
SP - 686
EP - 697
JO - Leadership Quarterly
JF - Leadership Quarterly
IS - 6
ER -