Abstract
This paper examines the similarities and differences in the determinants of the three mutual fund exit forms: liquidation, within-family merger, and across-family merger. All defunct mutual fund portfolios have smaller size and lower inflows. A family is less willing to liquidate a portfolio but more likely to merge a portfolio within the family if it offers more share classes. Large families are more likely to merge portfolios within the family, while a family with poor performance is more likely to sell relatively unique portfolios to other families to stay focused. This paper also compares within-objective mergers with across-objective mergers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1365-1401 |
Journal | Journal of Business |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Corresponding author email
zxinge@ceibs.eduKeywords
- DETERMINANTS
- PERFORMANCE PERSISTENCE
- SURVIVORSHIP BIAS
Indexed by
- ABDC-A*
- Scopus
- SSCI