Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis

Saul Estrin (First Author), Klaus E. Meyer (Participant Author), Bo B. Nielsen (Participant Author), Sabina Nielsen (Participant Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal

    130 Citations (Web of Science)

    Abstract

    National institutions shape the ability of civil society and minority shareholders to monitor and influence decision-makers in listed state owned enterprises (SOEs), and thereby their strategies of internationalization. We argue that the weaker are such controls, the more likely such decision makers pursue self-serving motives, and thus shy away from international investment. Listed SOEs’ strategies will thus be more similar to those of wholly privately owned enterprises (POEs) when these controls are more effective. Building on Williamson's (2000) hierarchy of institutions, we examine how home country institutions exerting normative, regulatory, and governance-related controls affect the comparative internationalization levels of listed SOEs and POEs. Based on a matched sample of 153 majority state owned and 153 wholly privately owned listed firms from 40 different countries, we confirm that, when home country institutions enable effective control, the internationalization strategies of listed SOEs and POEs converge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)294-307
    JournalJournal of World Business
    Volume51
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Corresponding author email

    kmeyer@ceibs.edu

    Project name

    CEIBS Research Center for Emerging Market Studies

    Project sponsor

    其他

    Project No.

    N/A

    Keywords

    • Home country institutions
    • Internationalization
    • Matched sample
    • State owned enterprises
    • Tobit regression

    Indexed by

    • ABDC-A
    • Scopus
    • SSCI

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this