Abstract
This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-167 |
Journal | Social Justice Research |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Corresponding author email
lieven.brebels@hubrussel.beKeywords
- ATTENTION
- CONSCIOUSNESS
- ESTEEM
- JUDGMENTS
- JUSTICE
- NEGATIVE AFFECT
- OVERRIDE CONCERNS
- PERSONAL UNCERTAINTY
- Procedural fairness
- Self
- Self-focus
- Self-reflection
- Self-rumination
- UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT
- VALUE PROTECTION MODEL
Indexed by
- ABDC-B
- Scopus
- SSCI