Self-Focus and Procedural Fairness: The Role of Self-Rumination and Self-Reflection

Lieven Brebels (First Author), David De Cremer (Participant Author), Alain Van Hiel (Participant Author), Constantine Sedikides (Participant Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal

4 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-167
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Corresponding author email

lieven.brebels@hubrussel.be

Keywords

  • ATTENTION
  • CONSCIOUSNESS
  • ESTEEM
  • JUDGMENTS
  • JUSTICE
  • NEGATIVE AFFECT
  • OVERRIDE CONCERNS
  • PERSONAL UNCERTAINTY
  • Procedural fairness
  • Self
  • Self-focus
  • Self-reflection
  • Self-rumination
  • UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT
  • VALUE PROTECTION MODEL

Indexed by

  • ABDC-B
  • Scopus
  • SSCI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Focus and Procedural Fairness: The Role of Self-Rumination and Self-Reflection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this