TY - JOUR
T1 - Hub-airport congestion pricing and capacity investment
AU - Lin, Ming Hsin
AU - Zhang, Yimin
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This study examines hub-airport congestion pricing and capacity investment using a simple hub-spoke network model, in which hub-carrier scheduling causes both schedule delays and congestion delays. The “fixed-proportion assumption” is removed. We find the following. (i) A public hub airport requires both per-flight charges, which must be movement-related but cannot be weight-related, and discriminatory per-local and per-connecting passenger charges to reach the first-best outcome. (ii) Either weight-related per-flight charges or the marginal-operating-cost (MOC) pricing on local and/or connecting passengers cannot reach the first-best. (iii) First-best charges can lead capacity investment to be socially efficient. However, weight-related per-flights charges result in under-investment, whereas the MOC pricing results in over-investment in runway capacity. (iv) Private hubs that charge positive movement-related per-flight charges subsidize passengers through per-passenger charges. Finally, (v) movement-related per-flight charges lead private hubs to overinvest, whereas weight-related per-flight charges lead to either over- or under-investment.
AB - This study examines hub-airport congestion pricing and capacity investment using a simple hub-spoke network model, in which hub-carrier scheduling causes both schedule delays and congestion delays. The “fixed-proportion assumption” is removed. We find the following. (i) A public hub airport requires both per-flight charges, which must be movement-related but cannot be weight-related, and discriminatory per-local and per-connecting passenger charges to reach the first-best outcome. (ii) Either weight-related per-flight charges or the marginal-operating-cost (MOC) pricing on local and/or connecting passengers cannot reach the first-best. (iii) First-best charges can lead capacity investment to be socially efficient. However, weight-related per-flights charges result in under-investment, whereas the MOC pricing results in over-investment in runway capacity. (iv) Private hubs that charge positive movement-related per-flight charges subsidize passengers through per-passenger charges. Finally, (v) movement-related per-flight charges lead private hubs to overinvest, whereas weight-related per-flight charges lead to either over- or under-investment.
KW - Capacity investment
KW - Hub-airport congestion pricing
KW - Hub-carrier scheduling
KW - Movement-/weight-related charge
KW - Profit-maximizing hub airport
KW - Schedule and congestion delay
KW - Capacity investment
KW - Hub-airport congestion pricing
KW - Hub-carrier scheduling
KW - Movement-/weight-related charge
KW - Profit-maximizing hub airport
KW - Schedule and congestion delay
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=ceibs_wosapi&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000403989500005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.009
DO - 10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.009
M3 - Journal
SN - 1879-2367
VL - 101
SP - 89
EP - 106
JO - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
JF - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
ER -