TY - JOUR
T1 - Intellectual Capital, Supply Chain Learning, and Adaptability: A Comparative Investigation in China and the United States
AU - Wang, Z.
AU - Zhao, Xiande
AU - Schoenherr, T.
AU - Zhang, S.
PY - 2022/11/22
Y1 - 2022/11/22
N2 - This article investigates the relationship between intellectual capital, supply chain learning, and supply chain adaptability. Specifically, relying on organizational learning theory, a research model is proposed linking intellectual capital (consisting of the trichotomy of human, organizational, and social capital), supply chain learning (consisting of supplier learning and customer learning) and supply chain adaptability. We scrutinize these relationships in two culturally-diverse contexts, China and USA, and develop hypotheses concerning the differences in the relative strengths of these relationships. Data from 300 Chinese and 229 USA manufacturers in high-tech industries are used to test these hypotheses. While the relationships are generally supported, especially insightful are the results where they differ between the two countries. While human capital is more important in influencing organizational capital in USA, social capital is more important in China. Social capital also plays a more significant role in influencing customer learning in China, while no statistical differences are detected in social capital's influence on supplier learning across the two countries. The divergence observed can be explained by the cultural differences between the two countries. Implications are provided for managers in both countries to improve supply chain adaptability.
AB - This article investigates the relationship between intellectual capital, supply chain learning, and supply chain adaptability. Specifically, relying on organizational learning theory, a research model is proposed linking intellectual capital (consisting of the trichotomy of human, organizational, and social capital), supply chain learning (consisting of supplier learning and customer learning) and supply chain adaptability. We scrutinize these relationships in two culturally-diverse contexts, China and USA, and develop hypotheses concerning the differences in the relative strengths of these relationships. Data from 300 Chinese and 229 USA manufacturers in high-tech industries are used to test these hypotheses. While the relationships are generally supported, especially insightful are the results where they differ between the two countries. While human capital is more important in influencing organizational capital in USA, social capital is more important in China. Social capital also plays a more significant role in influencing customer learning in China, while no statistical differences are detected in social capital's influence on supplier learning across the two countries. The divergence observed can be explained by the cultural differences between the two countries. Implications are provided for managers in both countries to improve supply chain adaptability.
KW - Cross-country comparison
KW - intellectual capital
KW - structural equation modeling
KW - supply chain adaptability
KW - supply chain learning
KW - Companies
KW - Cross-country comparison
KW - Cultural differences
KW - Supply chains
KW - Knowledge management
KW - Economics
KW - Intellectual capital
KW - Supply chain learning
KW - Structural equation modeling
KW - Supply chain adaptability
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=ceibs_wosapi&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000879054100024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1109/TEM.2019.2956471
DO - 10.1109/TEM.2019.2956471
M3 - Journal
SN - 0018-9391
VL - 69
SP - 2738
EP - 2753
JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IS - 6
ER -