摘要
We propose a new construct-role-based paternalistic exchange, or followers' awareness of and engagement in a family-like exchange relationship with leaders that builds upon both leaders' parent-like role and followers' child-like obligation. We use this construct to explain the joint effect of leader authoritarianism and benevolence, the essential components of paternalistic leadership, on two culture-specific follower outcomes in Chinese settings: emic organizational citizenship behavior and deference to supervisor. Using three independent samples, we develop a unidimensional measure. We then employ another sample to test how leader authoritarianism and benevolence relate to role-based paternalistic exchange and, thereby, the two follower outcomes indirectly. Our results indicate that, in contrast to authoritarianism- or benevolence-dominant paternalistic leadership, classical paternalistic leadership (the balanced display of leader authoritarianism and benevolence) has the greatest potential to facilitate role-based paternalistic exchange, which, in turn, positively relates to the two follower outcomes. These results suggest that role-based paternalistic exchange advances our understanding of how paternalistic leadership enhances emic outcomes in Chinese settings.
源语言 | 英语 |
---|---|
页(从-至) | 433-455 |
页数 | 23 |
期刊 | Asia Pacific Journal of Management |
卷 | 39 |
期 | 2 |
DOI | |
出版状态 | 已出版 - 2022 |
Corresponding author email
wac@ceibs.edu关键词
- Authoritarianism
- Benevolence
- Deference to supervisor
- Organizational citizenship behavior
- Paternalistic leadership
- Polynomial regression
成果物的来源
- ABDC-A
- Scopus
- SSCI
指纹
探究 'Role-based paternalistic exchange: Explaining the joint effect of leader authoritarianism and benevolence on culture-specific follower outcomes' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。引用此
Wang, A.-C. A., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, Y., Hsu, M.-S., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2022). Role-based paternalistic exchange: Explaining the joint effect of leader authoritarianism and benevolence on culture-specific follower outcomes. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(2), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09732-y