Abstract
We develop and test an integrative model that examines the fit between compensation schemes, executives' characteristics, and situational factors. We propose that a fit among all three factors is crucial to motivate desirable managerial behaviors. Using a specially designed management simulation, our study demonstrates that the effectiveness of incentive compensation to motivate managerial behaviors depends on executives' core self-evaluation and firm performance. Our results show that, relative to fixed salary compensation, executives with higher core self-evaluation respond to incentive compensation with greater perseverance, competitive strategy focus, ethical behavior, and strategic risk taking during organizational decline. However, these interaction effects are not present during organizational growth. Our theory and empirical evidence provide significant insights into the complex relationships among compensation schemes, executives' characteristics, firm performance, and managerial behaviors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1343-1362 |
Journal | Strategic Management Journal |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Corresponding author email
dchng@ceibs.eduKeywords
- core self-evaluation
- ethical behavior
- incentive compensation
- organizational decline
- strategic risk taking
Indexed by
- FT
- ABDC-A*
- Scopus
- SSCI
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When does incentive compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self-evaluation, and firm performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
Chng, D. H. M., Song, XB., Rodgers, MS., & Shih, E. (2012). When does incentive compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self-evaluation, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(12), 1343-1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1981