TY - JOUR
T1 - A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work
AU - Moran, Christina M.
AU - Kim, Tae-Yeol
AU - Liu, Zhi-Qiang
AU - Diefendorff, James M.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Self-determination theory (SDT) posits the existence of distinct types of motivation (i.e., external, introjected, identified, integrated, and intrinsic). Research on these different types of motivation has typically adopted a variable-centered approach that seeks to understand how each motivation in isolation relates to employee outcomes. We extend this work by adopting cluster analysis in a person-centered approach to understanding how different combinations or patterns of motivations relate to organizational factors. Results revealed five distinct clusters of motivation (i.e., low introjection, moderately motivated, low autonomy, self-determined, and motivated) and that these clusters were differentially related to need satisfaction, job performance, and work environment perceptions. Specifically, the self-determined (i.e., high autonomous motivation, low external motivation) and motivated (i.e., high on all types of motivation) clusters had the most favorable levels of correlates; whereas the low autonomy (i.e., least self-determined) cluster had the least favorable levels of these variables.
AB - Self-determination theory (SDT) posits the existence of distinct types of motivation (i.e., external, introjected, identified, integrated, and intrinsic). Research on these different types of motivation has typically adopted a variable-centered approach that seeks to understand how each motivation in isolation relates to employee outcomes. We extend this work by adopting cluster analysis in a person-centered approach to understanding how different combinations or patterns of motivations relate to organizational factors. Results revealed five distinct clusters of motivation (i.e., low introjection, moderately motivated, low autonomy, self-determined, and motivated) and that these clusters were differentially related to need satisfaction, job performance, and work environment perceptions. Specifically, the self-determined (i.e., high autonomous motivation, low external motivation) and motivated (i.e., high on all types of motivation) clusters had the most favorable levels of correlates; whereas the low autonomy (i.e., least self-determined) cluster had the least favorable levels of these variables.
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - Motivation
KW - Profile analysis
KW - Self-determination theory
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - Motivation
KW - Profile analysis
KW - Self-determination theory
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=ceibs_wosapi&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000312474800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
M3 - Journal
SN - 0001-8791
VL - 81
SP - 354
EP - 363
JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior
JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior
IS - 3
ER -