CEO Retirement, Corporate Governance and Conditional Accounting Conservatism

Shimin Chen (First Author), Feida Zhang (Participant Author), Serene Xu Ni (Participant Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal

9 Citations (Web of Science)


Based on 16,604 observations between 1994 and 2006, this study revisits the ‘horizon problem’ by examining how CEO retirement affects conditional accounting conservatism. We hypothesize and find that firms become less conservative in their financial reporting before the retirement of their CEOs, and that strong corporate governance mitigates the effect of CEO retirement. The literature concerning the horizon problem has suggested that CEOs manipulate earnings to boost short-term performance before they leave their companies (Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. G. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 51–89; Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1982). Incentive and tax effects of executive compensation plans. Australian Journal of Management, 7(2), 139–157), but the evidence is mixed. By examining conditional conservatism, we avoid some of the methodological difficulties that confront researchers when examining either real or accrual earnings management. Ours is the first study to provide evidence on how the horizon problem shapes conditional accounting conservatism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-465
JournalEuropean Accounting Review
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Corresponding author email

Indexed by

  • ABDC-A*
  • Scopus
  • SSCI


Dive into the research topics of 'CEO Retirement, Corporate Governance and Conditional Accounting Conservatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this