Auditor Communication Provisions in Private Loan Agreements: Do They Matter?

Lin Cheng, Jacob Jaggi, Paul N. Michas, Jeffrey Schatzberg

科研成果: 期刊稿件期刊论文

23 下载量 (Pure)

摘要

We examine auditor communication provisions (ACPs) in private loan agreements, which are private contracting mechanisms between external auditors and audit clients which establish communication between lenders and their borrowers' auditors. We provide evidence that lenders value privately-contracted auditor communication and often specify multiple ACPs that facilitate lender monitoring. In terms of debt contracting outcomes, we find ACPs are associated with a lower ex ante likelihood of loan covenant violation. We also examine audit fee implications for the borrower and find that ACPs are associated with higher audit fees, which is consistent with auditors responding to the litigation risk these provisions impose. We corroborate this by providing evidence that this relationship is concentrated in samples where the risk of third-party litigation is greater. Finally, we find evidence that ACPs lead auditors to become more conservative as their clients exhibit lower signed discretionary accruals when the risk of third-party litigation is greater.
源语言英语
页数52
期刊Journal of Practice and Theory
DOI
已出版 - 26 10月 2023

成果物的来源

  • ABDC-A*
  • SSCI

指纹

探究 'Auditor Communication Provisions in Private Loan Agreements: Do They Matter?' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此